The General Assembly expresses solidarity with the Palestinians by endorsing violence against Israeli civilians.
On Thursday the United Nations had an opportunity to speak with moral clarity and denounce the terrorist group Hamas. Instead, the General Assembly (UNGA) rejected a U.S.-sponsored resolution that called for an end to violence, encouraged intra-Palestinian reconciliation, and condemned terrorism.
A disappointed Nikki Haley, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., lamented, “Over the years, the UN has voted to condemn Israel over 500 times . . . and not one single resolution condemning Hamas. That, more than anything else, is a condemnation of the United Nations itself.”
Moreover, the U.N. indicated that Jews’ praying at the Western Wall is more worthy of condemnation than Hamas’s lobbing rockets indiscriminately at Israeli civilians. The UNGA passed another resolution calling for an end to “Israel’s occupation . . . including of East Jerusalem,” the location of Judaism’s holiest shrine.
This was the seventh anti-Israel resolution in as many days. Last week, on November 29, the U.N. celebrated its annual Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People with a series of anti-Israel speakers and resolutions highly critical of the Jewish state.
Marc Lamont Hill, one of the speakers, endorsed violence against Israelis and a boycott of the Jewish state and called for a “free Palestine from the river to the sea.” That slogan is widely understood to be a euphemism for destroying Israel, and it led to his termination from CNN.
Speakers at these events have called for boycotts of Israel since at least 2002, with a particularly egregious appeal issued in 2008 by Miguel D’Escoto Brockmann, president of the UNGA.
It is somewhat odd that November 29 serves as the day on which the U.N. directs even more scrutiny against the Jewish state. On that day in 1947, the UNGA voted to adopt Resolution 181, which called for a partition of the British Mandate of Palestine into two states – one for the Jews and one for the Arabs. Had this been realized 71 years ago, the Palestinians could have averted decades of statelessness and both parties could have prevented thousands of unnecessary deaths. Instead, November 29 is a constant reminder of what could have been.
At the time, the Jewish leadership, for the most part, supported the partition plan. The Palestinians, on the other hand, roundly condemned and rejected the move. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, a major Palestinian leader and collaborator with Hitler, later said in an interview that he would fight against partition and “would continue fighting until the Zionists were annihilated.”
Seemingly unaware of this history, around the 30th anniversary of Resolution 181, in 1977, the UNGA passed Resolution 32/40 B, making November 29 Palestinian Solidarity Day. There was no acknowledgement that Arab rejection had undermined the partition plan. Indeed, some in the extremist Palestinian camp suggest that this date was specifically chosen as a rejection of Israel’s right to exist, arguing that the decision to divide the land was a calamity. It appears that the U.N. is endorsing this view.
In the same resolution that created the day of solidarity, the UNGA voted to create the Division for Palestinian Rights (DPR). This body has served as a U.N.-sponsored and U.N.-funded propaganda arm, educating people globally about Palestinian rights while simultaneously vilifying the state of Israel.
The U.N. has subsequently used November 29 (or a nearby date, depending on each year’s scheduling) to hold events to express solidarity with the Palestinians. These U.N.-sponsored events often devolve into Israel-bashing sessions, with U.N.-commissioned reports that investigate alleged Israeli abuses of Palestinians and speakers who charge Israel with an array of horrific allegations, including false accusations of war crimes and apartheid.
Capping the Solidarity Day programming every year, the UNGA passes recycled resolutions that single out and castigate Israel. Among these resolutions is an admonishment of Israel for its treatment of Arabs in the formerly Syrian Golan. It risibly urges Israel to return the territory to the murderous Assad regime, while omitting any mention of Syria’s civil war or the deaths of hundreds of thousands in that conflict. Other resolutions refer to the Temple Mount only by its Arabic name, ignoring its Jewish ties.